Viet Chinh MaiThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Van Tu Nguyen, and Xuan Dai Nguyen

Institute of Construction Technology (ICT), Le Quy Don Technical University, Ha Noi 100000, Viet Nam


 

Received: April 24, 2025
Accepted: September 1, 2025
Publication Date: October 9, 2025

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202605_29(5).0015  


This paper presents an in-depth study of the structural behavior of exterior beam-column joints retrofitted with Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) under reversed cyclic loading. The focus is on evaluating the effectiveness of UHPC in enhancing the seismic performance of reinforced conventional concrete joints, particularly in terms of energy dissipation, stiffness degradation, and crack propagation. The study includes numerical analyses using ABAQUS software to simulate the response of conventional concrete (CC) joints and UHPC-retrofitted joints under cyclic loading. The results demonstrate that the UHPC retrofitting significantly improves the seismic resilience of exterior joints, with notable increases in load-carrying capacity, ductility, and energy dissipation. The maximum load of UHPC-retrofitted joints was found to be 18.8% higher than that of the conventional concrete joints, and they exhibited a more controlled displacement response. Additionally, the secant stiffness of UHPC-retrofitted joints was superior throughout the loading cycles, particularly at higher drift levels. Energy dissipation also showed a consistent advantage for the UHPC-retrofitted joints, with up to 22% higher energy absorption at the maximum loading compared to the conventional joints. Furthermore, damage evolution analysis indicated that while both joint types exhibited X-shaped crack patterns, the UHPC-retrofitted joints displayed delayed and less severe crack propagation


Keywords: Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC); Exterior beam-column joint; Reversed cyclic loading; Energy dissipation; Stiffness degradation; Damage


  1. [1] A. Puskas and L. Moga, (2015) “Sustainability of reinforced concrete frame structures–A case study" Inter national Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 10(2): 165–176. DOI: 10.2495/SDP-V10-N2 165-176.
  2. [2] L. da Rosa Ribeiro, H. M. Kroetz, F. Parisi, and A. T. Beck, (2024) “Optimal risk-based design of reinforced concrete beams against progressive collapse" Engineering Structures 300: 117158. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117158.
  3. [3] B. Zhao, F. Taucer, and T. Rossetto, (2009) “Field investigation on the performance of building structures during the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China" Engi neering Structures 31(8): 1707–1723. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.039.
  4. [4] A.Ghobarah,M.Saatcioglu,andI.Nistor,(2006)“The impact of the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami on structures and infrastructure" Engineering structures 28(2): 312–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.028.
  5. [5] B. Standard, (2005) “Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance" Part 1: 1998–1.
  6. [6] A.Committee.“Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-08) and commentary”. In: Strutural concrete building code/commentary. American Concrete Institute. 2008.
  7. [7] K. Farhang, F. Farahbod, and M. F. Nezamabadi. “Hysteresis behavior of 3D RC exterior beam-column joints strengthened with CFRP sheets and spike an chors”. In: Structures. 40. Elsevier. 2022, 1065–1077.
  8. [8] L.GUOandD.FAN,(2023)“UtilizingHybridMachine Learning To Estimate The Compressive Strength Of High Performance Concrete" Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 27(11): 3509–3522. DOI: 10.6180/ jase.202411_27(11).0008.
  9. [9] C.-C. Hung, H.-J. Hsiao, Y. Shao, and C.-H. Yen, (2023) “A comparative study on the seismic performance of RC beam-column joints retrofitted by ECC, FRP, and concrete jacketing methods" Journal of Building Engineering 64: 105691. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105691.
  10. [10] A. A. Zende, R. Khadiranaikar, A. I. A. Momin, et al., (2022) “Shear behavior of high strength self-compacting concrete slender beams without web reinforcement" Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 26(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.6180/jase.202301_26(1).0001.
  11. [11] Y. A. Al-Salloum, T. H. Almusallam, S. H. Alsayed, and N.A.Siddiqui, (2011) “Seismic behavior of as-built, ACI-complying, and CFRP-repaired exterior RC beam column joints" Journal of composites for construction 15(4): 522–534. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943 5614.0000186.
  12. [12] C.P.AntonopoulosandT.C.Triantafillou,(2003) “Experimental investigation of FRP-strengthened RC beam column joints" Journal of composites for construction 7(1): 39–49. DOI: 10.1061 / (ASCE ) 1090 0268(2003)7:1(39).
  13. [13] C. Beschi, P. Riva, G. Metelli, and A. Meda, (2015) “HPFRCjacketing of non seismically detailed RC corner joints" Journal of Earthquake Engineering 19(1): 25–47. DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2014.948646.
  14. [14] M. Engindeniz, L. F. Kahn, and A.-H. Zureick. “Pre 1970 RC corner beam-column-slab joints: Seismic adequacy and upgradability with CFRP composites”. In: Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. International Association for Earthquake Engineering (IAEE) Tokyo. 2008, 12–17.
  15. [15] A. Ghobarah and A. Said, (2002) “Shear strengthening of beam-column joints" Engineering structures 24(7): 881–888. DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00026-3.
  16. [16] C. Röhm, B. Novák, S. Sasmal, R. Karusala, and V. Srinivas, (2012) “Behaviour of fibre reinforced beam column sub-assemblages under reversed cyclic loading" Construction and Building Materials 36: 319–329. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.114.
  17. [17] I. S. Code, (2002) “IS 1893 (part 1), criteria for earth quake resistant design of structures" Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India:
  18. [18] Z. Cai, X. Duan, L. Liu, Z. Lu, and J. Ye, (2024) “Rein forced ultra-high performance concrete beam under flexure and shear: Experiment and theoretical model" Case Studies in Construction Materials 20: e02647. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02647.
  19. [19] M. Abdellatief, S. M. Al-Tam, W. E. Elemam, H. Alanazi, G. M. Elgendy, and A. M. Tahwia, (2023) “Development of ultra-high-performance concrete with low environmental impact integrated with metakaolin and industrial wastes" Case Studies in Construction Materials 18: e01724. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01724.
  20. [20] X. B. Nguyen, V.-C. Mai, and C. B. Dao, (2025) “Dynamic Analysis Of The UHPFRC High-rise Building Un der High Explosion Using Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian Approach" Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 28(2): 273–281. DOI: 10.6180/jase.202502_28(2).0007.
  21. [21] F. Niu, Y. Liu, F. Xue, H. Sun, T. Liu, H. He, X. Kong, Y. Chen, and H. Liao, (2025) “Ultra-high performance concrete: A review of its material properties and usage in shield tunnel segment" Case Studies in Construction Materials: e04194. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04194.
  22. [22] T. Fu, K. Wang, Z. Zhu, X. Ren, Y. Li, L. Xu, L. Meng, and Z. Sun. “Seismic performance of prefabricated square hollow section piers strengthened by jacket ing using UHPC and high-strength steel”. In: Struc tures. 47. Elsevier. 2023, 449–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc. 2022.11.077.
  23. [23] K.E.Hogarth.“Retrofitting of Severely Seismically Dam aged Bridge Piers Using Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC)". (phdthesis). Idaho State University, 2024.
  24. [24] C. Hou, G. Ma, H.-J. Hwang, S. Li, and S.-M. Kang, (2024) “Seismic retrofit of intact and damaged RC columns using prefabricated steel cage-reinforced UHPC jackets and NSM GFRP bars" Engineering Structures 317: 118665. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118665.
  25. [25] Z. Zhang, P. Zou, E.-F. Deng, S.-B. Wang, Y.-Y. Pang, H.-T. Xue, S.-R. Men, and D.-X. Liu, (2024) “Seismic performance of a new type of prefabricated bridge pier with cast-in-place UHPC jacketing" Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 24(3): 173.
  26. [26] M.I. Khan, M. A. Al-Osta, S. Ahmad, and M. K. Rah man, (2018) “Seismic behavior of beam-column joints strengthened with ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete" Composite Structures 200: 103–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.080.
  27. [27] TCVN. Design of concrete and reinforced concrete structures. TCVN. 2018.
  28. [28] D.S. Dassault Systèmes, (2016) “Abaqus/CAE User’s Guide":
  29. [29] S. Bahij, S. K. Adekunle, M. Al-Osta, S. Ahmad, S. U. Al-Dulaijan, and M. K. Rahman, (2018) “Numerical investigation of the shear behavior of reinforced ultra-high performance concrete beams" Structural Concrete 19(1): 305–317. DOI: 10.1002/suco.201700062.
  30. [30] R. Park, (1989) “Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing" Bulletin of the new Zealand society for earthquake engineer ing 22(3): 155–166. DOI: 10.5459/bnzsee.22.3.155-166.