Jiawen Yu1,2This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and Baoyu Qiu3This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

1School of Foreign Languages, Nanfang College Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510970, China

2Faculty of Education, Language, Psychology, and Music, SEGi University, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, 47810, Malaysia

3The Department of Communication Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau


 

Received: September 1, 2025
Accepted: October 13, 2025
Publication Date: November 12, 2025

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202606_29(6).0013  


The role of artificial intelligence (AI) technology on the self-efficacy of English language learners in mastering the English language speech. The swift technological advancement has made AI-based English learning technologies, such as speech recognition, speech correction, and speaking assessment, a critical variable in improving phonological skills of learners. The present paper discusses the different roles of AI in second language learning with emphasis on the impact it has on communication preparedness and communication anxiety of learners and learning environment. It achieves this by analyzing the existing AI based learning applications and how they are developed in the English speaking test assessment systems and the digital textbook applications. Research states that AI technologies can enhance the willingness of learners to communicate, decrease the fear of communication, and improve the conditions under which language learning takes place, which all result into boosting self-efficacy among English language learners. Two items that can illustrate the technical and application limits of the existing AI technologies that need research and development are the accuracy of the speech recognition and the optimization of the learning environment. This study introduces a way to improve the performance of the HMM model in speech recognition by introducing a nonparametric approach to maximizing the duration distribution, and experimentally validates the approach on NAO robot. The results indicate that the enhanced model is the one with a significant increase in the speech recognition ability. The research represented in this paper provides new insights and perspectives of research in the related fields, as well as theoretical and practical evidence of AI application in English speech recognition.


Keywords: artificial intelligence, English speech learning, self-efficacy, speech recognition, HMM models


  1. [1] S. N. P. Erito, (2023) “Exploring ESP students’ perception toward the potential of artificial intelligence to promote students’ self-efficacy in English writing skill" Journal of English Language Learning 7(2): 457–464. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.31949/jell.v7i2.7598.
  2. [2] R. Shadiev, J. Liu, and P.-Y. Cheng, (2023) “The impact of mobile-assisted social language learning activities on speaking skills and self-efficacy development" IEEE Trans actions on Learning Technologies 16(5): 664–679. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3243245.
  3. [3] C. Zhang, Y. Meng, and X. Ma, (2024) “Artificial intelligence in EFL speaking: Impact on enjoyment, anxiety, and willingness to communicate" System 121: 103259. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103259.
  4. [4] A. M. Moybekaetal., (2023) “Artificial intelligence and English classroom: The implications of AI toward EFL students’ motivation" Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan 7(2): 2444–2454.
  5. [5] K. Parsakia, (2023) “The effect of chatbots and AI on the self-efficacy, self-esteem, problem-solving and critical thinking of students" Health Nexus 1(1): 71–76.
  6. [6] Y. Wu,(2024) “Exploration of the integration and application of the modern new Chinese style interior design" International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications 45(2): 28–36.
  7. [7] J. Zhao,(2024)“These mantic function of modern Chinese “Negation + X” modal words based on communication technology and big data corpus" Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing 122: 275–286.
  8. [8] P. Chen, (2024) “Research on business English approaches from the perspective of cross-cultural communication competence" International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications 45(2): 13–22.
  9. [9] C.Zhang,M.Li,andD.Wu,(2022)“Federatedmultido main learning with graph ensemble autoencoder GMM for emotion recognition" IEEE Transactions on Intelli gent Transportation Systems 24(7): 7631–7641. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.3209424.
  10. [10] B. Zou et al., (2023) “Supporting speaking practice by social network-based interaction in artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted language learning" Sustainability 15(4): 2872. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.3390/su15042872.
  11. [11] J. Liu, (2024) “Enhancing English language education through big data analytics and generative AI" Journal of Web Engineering 23(2): 227–249.
  12. [12] J.-C. Liang et al., (2023) “Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education: An integrated bibliographic analysis and systematic review approach" Interactive Learning Environments 31(7): 4270–4296. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2018485
  13. [13] R. Zhi and Y. Wang, (2024) “On the relationship be tween EFL students’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence, teachers’ immediacy and teacher-student rapport, and their willingness to communicate" System 124: 103341. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103341.
  14. [14] C. Liu et al., (2023) “Incorporating a reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence supported English writing environments" Interactive Learning Environments 31(9): 5614–5632. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2069749.
  15. [15] S. H. Grandhi and M. M. Kamruzzaman, (2024) “Automatic stutter speech recognition and classification using hyper-heuristic search algorithm" International Journal of AutomationandSmartTechnology14(1): DOI: https: //doi.org/10.5875/dm761m36.
  16. [16] Y. Wang, F. Yasmin, and A. Akbar, (2023) “Impact of the internet on English language learning among university students: Mediating role of academic self-efficacy" Frontiers in Psychology 14: 1184185. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184185.
  17. [17] Q. Xia et al., (2023) “The mediating effects of needs sat is faction on the relationships between prior knowledge and self-regulated learning through artificial intelligence chatbot" British Journal of Educational Technology 54(4): 967–986. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13369.
  18. [18] Y. Guo, Y. Wang, and J. L. Ortega-Martín, (2023) “The impact of blended learning-based scaffolding techniques on learners’ self-efficacy and willingness to communicate" Porta Linguarum: Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras 40: 253–273.
  19. [19] J. Li et al., (2024) “Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance the writing of English aca demic papers by non-native English-speaking medical students—The educational application of ChatGPT" BMC Medical Education 24(1): 736. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05044-2
  20. [20] T. Xiao, S. Yi, and S. Akhter, (2024) “AI-supported online language learning: Learners’ self-esteem, cognitive emotion regulation, academic enjoyment, and language success" International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 25(3): 77–96. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7554.
  21. [21] A.Létourneau,M.DeslandesMartineau,P.Charland, J. A. Karran, J. Boasen, and P. M. Léger, (2025) “A systematic review of AI-driven intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) in K-12 education" NPJ Science of Learning 10(1): 29. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00320-7.
  22. [22] G. Kestin, K. Miller, A. Klales, T. Milbourne, and G. Ponti, (2025) “AI tutoring outperforms in-class active learning: an RCT introducing a novel research-based design in an authentic educational setting" Scientific Reports 15(1): 17458. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97652-6
  23. [23] S. Wang, F. Wang, Z. Zhu, J. Wang, T. Tran, andZ.Du, (2024) “Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review" Expert Systems with Applications 252: 124167. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167.
  24. [24] C.C.Lin,A.Y.Huang,andO.H.Lu,(2023)“Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: a systematic review" Smart Learning Environments 10(1): 41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00260-y. 
  25. [25] H. Shou and Y. Lu, (2025) “Student Performance Evaluation Technique By Applying Support Vector Classification And Metaheuristic Algorithms On The SVC Model’s Reliability" Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 28(3): 653–666. DOI: http: //dx.doi.org/10.6180/jase.202503_28(3).0020.