Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Tzung-hang Lee This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1 , Yusong Cao2 and Yen-mi Lin1

1Department of Mechanical Engineering Tamkang University Tamsui, Taipei, Taiwan 251, R. O. C.
2School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering University of New Orleans New Orleans, LA 70115, U. S. A.


 

Received: June 22, 2001
Accepted: July 24, 2001
Publication Date: September 1, 2001

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2001.4.3.01  


ABSTRACT


An on-line training functional-link neural network predictor/controller for dynamic positioning of water surface structures is described in this paper. To develop a neural network for time-evolving systems, the deterministic on-line training model in a traditional parameter identification theory and the functional-link network are combined. The system’s previous input and output are used to be additional enhancements to the functional-link network. The on-line training neural network predictor acquires the knowledge about the system using a small number of samples of the latest system status measured on board of the structure. The trained functional-link neural network is used with an optimal controller to control the output of the system. The accuracy and robustness of the on-line training predictor are demonstrated through the numerical simulations of two ship maneuvers. The on-line training neural network predictor/controller is applied to the dynamic positioning (station-keeping) of a ship in a uniform current with and without external environmental disturbances. The results of the numerical simulations are very satisfactory.


Keywords: On-line Training, Neural Network Predictor/controller, Dynamic Positioning


REFERENCES


  1. [1] CMPT, “Floating Structures: a Guide for Design and Analysis” (1998).
  2. [2] DeBitetto, P. A., “Fuzzy logic for depth control of unmanned undersea vehicles,” Proc. of Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, Cambridge, MA, U. S. A. (1994).
  3. [3] Edward V. L., “Principles of naval architecture (PNA),” The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. III (1989).
  4. [4] Gu, M. X., Pao, Y. H. and Yip, P. P. C, “Neural-net computing for dynamic positioning of vessels at sea,” Marine Jubilee Meeting, Wageningen, The Netherlands (1992).
  5. [5] Gu, M. X., Pao, Y. H. and Yip, P. P. C, “Neural-net computing for real-time control of a ship’s dynamic positioning at sea,” Computer Engineering Practice, pp. 305-314 (1993).
  6. [6] Gu, M. X. and Li, D., “Dynamic positioning of ships using a 1-step ahead neural network controller,” Int. Conf. on Hydrodynamics, Wuxi, China (1994).
  7. [7] Ishii, K., Fujii, T. and Ura, T., “A quick adaptive method in a neural network based control system for AUVs,” Proc. of Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA (1994).
  8. [8] Li, D. and Gu, M.X., “Dynamic positioning of ships using a planned neural network controller,” J. of Ships Research, Vol. 40, No. 2 (1996).
  9. [9] Parsons, M. G, Chubb, A. C., Cao, Y. and Stefanopoulou, A. G., “An initial assessment of fuzzy logic vessel path control,” Proc. of Sym. on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA (1994).
  10. [10] Robert, G. N., “Approaches to fuzzy autopilot design optimization,” Proc. of Manoeuvring and Control of Marine Craft (1997).
  11. [11] Zhang, Y., Hearn, G. E. and Sen, P., “Neural network approaches to a class of ship control (Part I: Theoretical Design),” 11th Ship Control Systems Symposium, Vol. 1 (1997).
  12. [12] Zhang, Y., Hearn, G. E. and Sen, P., “Neural network approaches to a class of ship control (Part II: Simulation Studies),” 11th Ship Control Systems Symposium, Vol. 1 (1997).