Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Chia-Yen Chen This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1, Po-Sen Huang1 and Ying-Chen Lin1

1Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National University of Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.


 

Received: February 4, 2013
Accepted: June 28, 2013
Publication Date: September 1, 2013

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2013.16.3.02  


ABSTRACT


The paper proposes two approaches to improve the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm in the registration of large scale range data obtained by a Velodyne LIDAR at different locations in an outdoor environment. The first proposed approach discards points that cannot be matched in the datasets during the registration process to prevent errors from these points from affecting the results. The second approach extracts feature points that are representative of the datasets to perform the registration process and similarly preventing mismatching points from affecting the results. Experiments show that both approaches perform better than the original ICP algorithm.


Keywords: 3D Reconstruction, Range Data, LIDAR, Iterative Closest Point, ICP


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Godbaz, J. P., Cree, M. J. and Dorrington, A. A., “Undue Influence: Mitigating Range-Intensity Coupling in AMCW ‘Flash’ LiDAR Using Scene Texture,” Proc. IVCNZ, pp. 304309 (2009). doi: 10.1109/IVCNZ. 2009.5378390
  2. [2] Glennie, C. and Lichiti, D. D., “Static Calibration and Analysis of the Velodyne HDL-64E S2 for High Accuracy Mobile Scanning,” Remote Sensing, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 16101624 (2010). doi: 10.3390/rs2061610
  3. [3] Glennie, C. and Lichiti, D. D., “Temporal Stability of the Velodyne HDL-64E S2 Scanner for High Accuracy Scanning Applications,” Remote Sensing, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 539553 (2011). doi: 10.3390/rs3030539
  4. [4] Kurniawati, H., Schulmeister, J. C., Bandyopadhyay, T., Papadopoulos, T., Hover, F. S. and Patrikalakis, N. M., “Infrastructure for 3D Model Reconstruction of Marine Structures,” International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE), pp. 359364 (2011).
  5. [5] Besl, P. J. and McKay, N. D., “A Method for Registration of 3D Shapes,” PAMI, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 239254 (1992). doi: 10.1109/34.121791
  6. [6] Rusinkiewicz, S. and Levoy, M., “Efficient Variants of the ICP Algorithm,” Proc. of 3DIM, pp. 145152 (2001). doi: 10.1109/IM.2001.924423
  7. [7] Masuda, T., Sakaue, K. and Yokoya, N., “Registration and Integration of Multiple Range Images for 3-D Model Construction,” Proc. CVPR, pp. 879883 (1996). doi: 10.1109/ICPR.1996.546150
  8. [8] Dorai, C., Weng, J. and Jain, A., “Registration and Integration of Multiple Object Views for 3D Model Construction,” PAMI, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 8389 (1998). doi: 10.1109/34.655652
  9. [9] Pulli, K., “Multiview Registration for Large Data Sets,” Proc. 3DIM, pp. 160168 (1999). doi: 10.1109/ IM.1999.805346
  10. [10] Diebel, J., Reuterswärd, K., Thrun, S., Davis, J. and Gupta, R., “Simultaneous Localization and Mapping with Active Stereo Vision,” 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat No 04CH37566) IROS-04, Vol. 4, pp. 34363443 (2004). doi: 10.1109/IROS.2004. 1389948