Jiangjiang Li, Lijuan FengThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Qingmin Song, Xianan Song, and Jiaxiang Wang

School of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Science and Technology, Zhengzhou 450064 China


 

Received: October 11, 2025
Accepted: December 11, 2025
Publication Date: February 3, 2026

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202608_31.009  


To address the issues such as the single extraction of health features and the low estimation accuracy in the process of estimating the health status and predicting the remaining service life of lithium batteries, this paper proposes a novel battery health status estimation and remaining life prediction method based on Inception BiLSTM model. By analyzing the state during the charging process of lithium batteries, nine health factors are extracted. The strongly correlated health factors are selected through the Pearson correlation coefficient and are used as the input of the model. The initial position of the dung beetle is generated using the chaotic initialization tent mapping, and the position of the thief dung beetle is optimized using the sine and cosine strategy, which solves the local convergence problem caused by the initialization of the DBO (Dung Beetle Optimizer) algorithm and optimizes the balance of the DBO algorithm, thereby improving the stability of the prediction. Practical trials manifest that, against the backdrop of current sophisticated prognostic models, the fresh design yields more accurate residual-life outlooks for lithium battery packs.


Keywords: battery health status estimation, remaining life prediction, Inception-BiLSTM, Pearson correlation coefficient, DBO


  1. [1] P. Takyi-Aninakwa, S. Wang, G. Liu, C. Fernandez, W. Kang, and Y .Song,(2025) “Deep learning framework designed for high-performance lithium-ion batteries state monitoring" Renewable and Sustainable Energy Re views 218: 115803. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115803.
  2. [2] H. Yu, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, M. Li, W. Chen, Z. Hu, M. Zhu, and Y. Huang, (2025) “Activation and Stabilization Strategies of Aluminum Metal Anode Toward High Performance Aqueous Al Metal Batteries" Advanced Materials: 2507164. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202507164.
  3. [3] E. Ratchai, M. Luengchavanon, K.-a. Techato, W. Lim but, N. Y. Voo, and S. Narkgrom,(2024)“AMicrowave assisted Solid-state Method With Chitin (Shrimp Shell Waste) UsedToSynthesize Cathode Materials For Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries" Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 27(3): 2159–2168. DOI: 10.6180/jase.202403_27(3).0002.
  4. [4] S. Xia, X. Xu, W. Wu, Y. Chen, L. Liu, G. Wang, L. Fu, Q. Zhang, T. Wang, J. He, et al., (2025) “Advancements in functionalized high-performance separators for lithium sulfur batteries" Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 163: 100924. DOI: 10.1016/j.mser.2025.100924.
  5. [5] M. Ahwiadi and W. Wang, (2025) “Battery health monitoring and remaining useful life prediction techniques: A review of technologies" Batteries 11(1): 31. DOI: 10.3390/batteries11010031.
  6. [6] A. A. Laghari, H. Li, A. A. Khan, Y. Shoulin, S. Karim, and M. A. K. Khani, (2024) “Internet of Things (IoT) applications security trends and challenges" Discover Internet of Things 4(1): 36. DOI: 10.1007/s43926-024-00090-5.
  7. [7] S. Wang, R. Zhou, Y. Ren, M. Jiao, H. Liu, and C. Lian, (2025) “Advanced data-driven techniques in AI for predicting lithium-ion battery remaining useful life: a comprehensive review" Green Chemical Engineering 6(2): 139–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.gce.2024.09.001.
  8. [8] W.Huang,T.Zhou,J.Ma,andX.Chen,(2025)“Anen semble model based on fusion of multiple machine learning algorithms for remaining useful life prediction of lithium battery in electric vehicles" Innovations in Applied Engineering and Technology: 1–12. DOI: 10.62836/iaet.v4i1.319.
  9. [9] L. Yang, M. He, Y. Ren, B. Gao, and H. Qi, (2025) “Physics-informed neural network for co-estimation of state of health, remaining useful life, and short-term degradation path in Lithium-ion batteries" Applied Energy 398: 126427. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126427.
  10. [10] F. Jiang, X. Hou, and M. Xia, (2025) “Spatio-temporal attention-based hidden physics-informed neural network for remaining useful life prediction" Advanced Engineering Informatics 63: 102958. DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2024.102958.
  11. [11] R. Khelif, B. Chebel-Morello, S. Malinowski, E. Laajili, F. Fnaiech, and N. Zerhouni, (2016) “Direct remaining useful life estimation based on support vector regression" IEEE Transactions on industrial electronics 64(3): 2276–2285. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2016.2623260.
  12. [12] J. Liu and Z. Chen, (2019) “Remaining useful life pre diction of lithium-ion batteries based on health indicator and Gaussian process regression model" Ieee Access 7: 39474–39484. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905740.
  13. [13] K. Qian, Y. Li, Q. Zou, K. Cao, and Z. Li, (2025) “SOH and RUL Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Partial Charging Curve Features" Energies 18(13): 3248. DOI: 10.3390/en18133248.
  14. [14] R.-J. Kuo, S. L. Huang, F. E. Zulvia, and T. W. Liao, (2018) “Artificial bee colony-based support vector ma chines with feature selection and parameter optimization for rule extraction" Knowledge and Information Systems 55(1): 253–274. DOI: 10.1007/s10115-017-1083-8.
  15. [15] W. N. Ismail, M. M. Hassan, H. A. Alsalamah, and G. Fortino, (2020) “CNN-based health model for regular health factors analysis in internet-of-medical things environment" IEEE Access 8: 52541–52549. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980938.
  16. [16] J. Liu, R. Hao, Q. Liu, and W. Guo, (2023) “Prediction of remaining useful life of rolling element bearings based on LSTM and exponential model "International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 14(4): 1567 1578. DOI: 10.1007/s13042-023-01807-8.
  17. [17] J. Liang, H. Liu, and N.-C. Xiao, (2024) “A hybrid approach based on deep neural network and double exponential model for remaining useful life prediction" Ex pert Systems with Applications 249: 123563. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123563.
  18. [18] S. Li, Z. Chen, Q. Liu, W. Shi, and K. Li, (2020) “Modeling and analysis of performance degradation data for reliability assessment: A review" IEEE Access 8: 74648 74678. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2987332.
  19. [19] X. Cong, C. Zhang, J. Jiang, W. Zhang, and Y. Jiang, (2020) “A hybrid method for the prediction of the remaining useful life of lithium-ion batteries with accelerated capacity degradation" IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 69(11): 12775–12785. DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3024019.
  20. [20] Z. Fang, A. Gupta, and M. Khammash, (2023) “Con vergence of regularized particle filters for stochastic reaction networks" SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 61(2): 399–430. DOI: 10.1137/21M1453025.
  21. [21] S. Yin, H. Li, A. A. Laghari, L. Teng, T. R. Gadekallu, and A. Almadhor, (2024) “FLSN-MVO: edge computing and privacy protection based on federated learning Siamese network with multi-verse optimization algorithm for industry 5.0" IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society: DOI: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2024. 3520562.
  22. [22] S. Yin, H. Li, A. A. Laghari, T. R. Gadekallu, G. A. Sampedro, and A. Almadhor, (2024) “An anomaly detection model based on deep auto-encoder and capsule graph convolution via sparrow search algorithm in 6G In ternet of Everything" IEEE Internet of Things Journal 11(18): 29402–29411. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3353337.